[keycloak-dev] Keycloak server environments

[Bill Burke]

Do what you want, but I think its silly to not just adapt LiveOak to use 
Resteasy/JAX-RS.  If LiveOak supports BIO/Streams, it would be easy to 
adapt Resteasy to run in that environment.  Its already been done for 
Netty 3 and 4, JDK HTTP, and even Grizzly.

On 12/14/2013 7:57 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> Currently Keycloak runs on Undertow and relies heavily on Resteasy. This doesn't work for the LiveOak project in the long run.
>
> After M1 I would like to create a Keycloak core that doesn't depend on Undertow or Resteasy. This should provide most of the logic except for wiring-up endpoints. For WildFly/EAP I would assume we'd provide endpoints using Undertow/Resteasy. Those would live in the Keycloak project. Then me and Marek will provide endpoints using Liveoak, these would live in the Liveoak project.
>
> Further, for some dependencies I'd also like to make these pluggable. For example http client and json processing. Not sure what libraries would be required, but I basically don't want to bring in yet-another-library if one exists in Liveoak that can do the job.
>
> In summary what I want to do is to make sure Keycloak can be run on both WildFly/EAP and LiveOak and at the same time:
>
> * Share as much as possible of the code
> * Implement REST endpoints in Liveoak with the minimum amount of code
> * Reduce the amount of dependencies Keycloak introduces in Liveoak
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com