[keycloak-dev] Keycloak server environments

[Bill Burke]

Again, create extra work for yourself if you want to...But if LiveOak is 
using Netty or Undertow, no reason JAX-RS can't be plugged in.  Its 
funny how Vert.x can place so much importance on polyglot, yet can't 
support a simple REST framework.


On 12/18/2013 12:41 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> Resteasy/JAX-RS on LiveOak makes as much sense as margarine on butter. LiveOak is a container for REST resources and doesn't provide direct access to BIO/Streams.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
>> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Monday, 16 December, 2013 2:09:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Keycloak server environments
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/2013 8:52 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>> Do what you want, but I think its silly to not just adapt LiveOak to use
>>> Resteasy/JAX-RS.  If LiveOak supports BIO/Streams, it would be easy to
>>> adapt Resteasy to run in that environment.  Its already been done for
>>> Netty 3 and 4, JDK HTTP, and even Grizzly.
>>>
>>
>> That being said, the code does need refactoring to get the bits that
>> aren't JAX-RS specific into a Java API that could be used.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com