[keycloak-dev] abstracting out picketlink

[Boleslaw Dawidowicz]

I wouldn't consider it as a crime as well ;) 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
To: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 10:49:15 AM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] abstracting out picketlink

Just a little smile ;)

I think this is better in any case. IMO the IDM interfaces are to generic/abstract to be consumed directly + they do change the API to frequently.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 31 July, 2013 2:47:54 AM
> Subject: [keycloak-dev] abstracting out picketlink
> 
> Don't laugh, I know I said I wasn't going to do this, but I am now.
> Abstracting out picketlink will make an easier transition for me to fit
> in the new version of Picketlink.  Obviously it will also allow us to
> dump Picketlink too if it turns out its just not going to scale or they
> aren't accepting our pull requests.  Hopefully we won't have to do that
> though.
> 
> So merge from master often as I'll be committing as I go.
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev