[keycloak-dev] implement JPA model
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Fri Nov 1 13:11:52 EDT 2013
On 11/1/2013 11:17 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Bill,
> this is just a cop out.
>
Like I said, we can easily swap out persistence engines.
> You very well know this is just going to create more headache
> if ever KeyCloak is integrated into Wildfly. :)
>
Well, at the present, Picketlnk is a headache to deal with. So, I'm
removing the headache for now. If you don't like it, well, too bad :)
> In future versions of WF (starting WF9), we want to make use of PL IDM
> for the user stores across the subsystems. That is the reason we are
> implementing a JDBC store implementation in addition to the JPA store when
> a database is involved.
>
Like I said, we can easily swap out persistence engines. We're also not
going to wait for WF9. We're going to integrate now and have an
integrated experience for AS7, EAP6.1, and WF8.
> Unfortunately KeyCloak implementing its own JPA model will just increase
> the technical debt when we deal with an integrated system such as WildFly
> from a developer user experience perspective. :(
>
Correct, users will have a "technical debt" to Keycloak because it will
be an awesome integrated user experience, instead of the cluster fuck we
have now :)
Bill
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list