[keycloak-dev] bundle an SMTP server?
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Tue Nov 5 11:21:54 EST 2013
I disagree. Users aren't going to download Keycloak and immediately use
it in production. Autogenerated self-signed SSL certs, an SMTP server,
and a preconfigured DB all make sense as then the user can immediately
use keycloak in development and configure certs, db, etc. later when
they want to run it in production.
The less things a developer has to do to testdrive keycloak the better.
Too bad we can't offer preconfigured social provider. Then again, I
guess we could, and hope google, et. al. doesn't shut it down.
On 11/5/2013 10:57 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> Personally I don't think the zip dist should configure smtp, db or ssl. This should be left to an appliance (OpenShift cartridge?) or a hosted solution (keycloak.org?).
>
> * SSL certificates needs to be signed and associated with a domain
> * SMTP servers needs to be associated with a domain
> * Embedded relational db's are pretty crap and not suitable for production
>
> SMTP has quite a few caveats to make sure emails are not blocked by spam filters.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
>> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, 5 November, 2013 3:04:45 PM
>> Subject: [keycloak-dev] bundle an SMTP server?
>>
>> Along the lines of wanting to run out of the box, is there any reason we
>> shouldn't bundle an SMTP server (i.e. James) and have it preconfigured?
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list