[keycloak-dev] is UserManager really unused?

[Bill Burke]

On 11/20/2013 1:58 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 20 November, 2013 6:52:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] is UserManager really unused?
>>
>> LiveOak is what?
>
> The shiny new name for mbaas (or restafari which was the previous code-name)
>
>>
>> I've been thinking about removing Resteasy from at least the adapters.
>> Patching AS7/EAP to use Resteasy 3.0.x might be a non-starter for some.
>>    But I'd have to use the JDK's client API java.net.URL, or Apache
>> client.  The latter also may have versioning problems between AS7/EAP6
>> and Wildfly :(
>>
>> For server-side, I'd consider replacing JAX-RS if it can run under
>> AS7/EAP6/Wildfly without any dependency conflicts and could run under a
>> servlet container(for AS7/EAP6) or non-servlet Undertow(Wildfly).
>> Otherwise, it doesn't make much sense to switch it out.  For me, it all
>> boils down to not requiring users to patch JAX-RS.
>
> I wasn't talking about switching it out, but separating it into an optional module. I need to run Keycloak in LiveOak, which doesn't have support for servlets or jax-rs. This is why I'd like to be able to use the logic from Keycloak, but wire-up the endpoints with LiveOak. This with the minimum amount of code specific to the keycloak-liveoak integration.
>

I know you weren't talking about switching it out...But I am :) 
Specifically because of dependency issues.  Can REST processing for 
LiveOak live in a Servlet 3.0 container?

Bill

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com