[keycloak-dev] Remaining work for beta-4

[Stian Thorgersen]

Simply updating PL version didn't work as there's API changes.

Marek: can you update PL first thing on Monday morning?

Bill: we'll need to wait for Marek to update PL if we want AS7 to work with beta-4

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> To: "Marek Posolda" <mposolda at redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 1 August, 2014 9:31:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Remaining work for beta-4
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marek Posolda" <mposolda at redhat.com>
> > To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 8:16:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Remaining work for beta-4
> > 
> > On 31.7.2014 15:50, Bill Burke wrote:
> > > We MUST release by Wednesday.  All commits after Friday need to be done
> > > very carefully.  This means that you've run a full build and tested the
> > > distribution and demos.  Aerogear and Stan (among others) need a
> > > release...
> > >
> > > On 7/31/2014 9:24 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > >> Outstanding work for beta-4:
> > >>
> > >> * User federation - what's the status?
> > > Still working on UI and small issues.  Should be done Friday.
> > >
> > >> * Turn off cookie cache for all http clients (KEYCLOAK-537) - not sure I
> > >> understand this issue? isn't sticky sessions something that's configured
> > >> by the load balancer?
> > > Push this to 1.0.Final release.  The Apache HTTP Client instance is
> > > shared by the Adapter.  Cookie caching is on by default.  IIRC, sticky
> > > sessions by mod-jk are done via a cookie.  Thus accessCodeToToken
> > > requests will not be load balanced.
> > >
> > >> * RealmModel should have a link to realm admin app (KEYCLOAK-486) - I
> > >> don't think the admin console should refer to the app by name, instead
> > >> it
> > >> should either have a link or at least the id of the app associated with
> > >> the realm
> > > Can be pushed to 1.0.Final release, IMO.
> > >
> > >> * Issue with deploying on AS7 (KEYCLOAK-572) - should be fixed with new
> > >> PL
> > >> release, but do we really care about supporting AS7?
> > >>
> > > Yes we care about AS7.  We need a release from Picketlink on Monday so
> > > we can test on Tuesday.  We will have to make sure that picketlink
> > > modules are excluded in jboss-deployment-structure.xml and we include
> > > the picketlink modules directly.  Patching picketlink modules directly
> > > is not an option.
> > >
> > >> Issues I propose we push to beta-5:
> > >>
> > > I don't think we'll have a beta-5.  Next release will be 1.0.Final, ASAP
> > > after beta-4.
> > >
> > >> * LDAP sync - should this go into beta-5? or even wait until after
> > >> final?
> > > +1 Marek is close, but should wait until after beta-4 is out.
> > +1, Pedro is releasing picketlink today, but I am on PTO tomorrow. I can
> > finish sync on Monday though, but looks that it's too late for the
> > release...
> 
> We need updated PL for beta-4. I'll ping Pedro and try to upgrade it today.
> 
> > >
> > >> * Stress tests (KEYCLOAK-514) - we still haven't tested with a large
> > >> amount of users
> > I've tested with max 3000 users so far. I think I will need to setup
> > jenkins job for add big amount of users into DB and then test them.
> > 
> > Marek
> > >> * DB optimizations (KEYCLOAK-515) - maybe push this to after final?
> > >> * "Transaction not active" while performing a shutdown (KEYCLOAK-470) -
> > >> I
> > >> can't replicate this, do we close or just set to no fix version?
> > > close.  I coudln't replicate either.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>