[keycloak-dev] what's next for Alpha 3?
Marek Posolda
mposolda at redhat.com
Thu Feb 20 04:36:37 EST 2014
Some possible features I can think of:
-- Clustering support -- For example if I have load-balancer and two
keycloak servers "kc1" and "kc2" and client application doesn't
communicate directly with keycloak servers but it uses loadbalancer.
Then login request could be redirected by loadbalancer to "kc1" where is
created accessCode entry in TokenManager. But when client application
sends another request to load-balancer for exchanging code for
accessToken, it could be served by "kc2", which doesn't have this code
entry --> error. I did not test this scenario, but I am assuming that it
probably won't work due to this... Do we want to support this? I've also
created JIRA https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-323 which could be
related to this.
-- Importing realm from JSON file in admin console - When I choose file,
it displays me that I choosed file "testrealm.json". How about
displaying the content of this file instead of just file name? I think
it would be more user-friendly and also people will be able to edit the
content on the fly.
-- Importing data from JSON file into already existing realm - For
example I want to add 100 new users into realm, which already exists. Or
add new application, oauth clients or role mappings. I can imagine some
format like:
{
"realm": "test",
"strategy": "IGNORE_EXISTING",
"users" : [
{
"username" : "newUser",
"enabled": true,
"email" : "newUser at localhost",
"credentials" : [
{ "type" : "password",
"value" : "password" }
]
}
],
"roleMappings": [
{
"username": "newUser",
"roles": ["user"]
}
],
}
The strategy could be something like IGNORE_EXISTING (Ignore particular
user/application entry if it already exists) or MERGE (update attributes
of existing user/application). But maybe "strategy" is overcomplicated
and we can simply ignore existing entries?
-- Test coverage -- Keycloak has good testsuite for covering server-side
scenarios, but the test-coverage of real client-side adapters for AS7 or
Wildfly is closed to 0. It seems that testsuite should be enhanced to
test also with "real" applications like customer-portal, product-portal
etc. I can imagine that this will require start of AS7 and Wildfly, so
probably won't be tested during each build? Also it seems that there is
not much test coverage of admin console.
-- DB2 support - This is only remaining DB, which is certified by other
RH products. Probably not so important, but I will try to look at it
sooner during spare time. If we later need to support it and it will
require some changes of DB schema, there might be issues with backwards
compatibility... I hope that at this stage backward compatibility is
still not something important as Keycloak is still in development and
there will be some more features (like secured storage of realm private
keys) which will require DB schema changes?
Marek
On 20.2.2014 05:21, Bill Burke wrote:
> I'd like to work on OpenID connect support as well as refresh tokens.
> We also need to help meet Aerogear's requirements, probably mostly
> around bootstrapping on Openshift.
>
> Like Alpha 2. I'd like each one of us to do one thing major, then do
> another quick release 3-4 weeks from now.
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list