[keycloak-dev] Release next Monday or Tuesday

[Stian Thorgersen]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 10 January, 2014 2:30:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Release next Monday or Tuesday
> 
> I'm fine with this as long as no further things pop up.  This is an
> alpha release and so long as it is functional, we're good.

Sure, I can sort out the issues I listed, except it would be good if you could have a look at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-256.

> 
> I'm not sure about the JSF example addition.  I want all the examples to
> work off of the appliance (and pre-configured as marek suggested), and
> the appliance will be trimmed down to remove CDI/JSF in the future.
> People don't use JSP anymore, but so what?  The examples are very
> minimal on purpose because they focus on keycloak.  But, I've always
> wanted nice example applications in addition to these simple examples
> (like event juggler) so users can also see other technologies
> interacting with keycloak.

Makes sense. Just one question though, once the WildFly subsystem is ready, wouldn't the trimmed down appliance also not have support for JavaEE/deployments altogether? I think it makes sense to have two options for Keycloak (embedded in a fully functional WildFly/EAP, and a standalone that doesn't allow deployments of any sort).

> 
> 
> On 1/10/2014 9:09 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > There's still some outstanding issues, and some PRs to commit
> >
> > PRs:
> >
> > * Marek has spent a fair amount of time to update the third-party example
> > to JSF. I think we should at least commit this, and possibly also update
> > the other examples to JSF (there's not many people that use JSP any more).
> > We should also make sure the different versions of the examples are
> > in-sync.
> > * There's some issues in example README's some of which are fixed in a PR
> > by Karel Piwko
> > * OAuth Client installation page - to configure a "third party" app you
> > need the same info as to configure an app, so I've added an installation
> > page under clients
> > * Rename prn to sub - this has been renamed in the JWT spec a long time
> > ago, and we should commit this before we push an alpha
> >
> > Outstanding issues:
> >
> > * ClassCastException (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-256) - seems
> > to be a Resteasy issue (this is a blocker IMO)
> > * /auth-server/admin/ doesn't work
> > (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-255) - this is a WildFly issue
> > but we can add a simple work-around
> > * Style issue in realm import
> > (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-257)
> > * No warning if require SSL is enabled and not using https
> > (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-252) - If this option is enabled
> > neither the admin console or account mngt works, they just redisplay the
> > login form without any warning. I propose that we add a simple check to
> > RealmsResource#getTokenService that returns an error page if realm
> > requires ssl and request is not https://.....
> >
> > I propose that we hold off the release a few days, so we can get the above
> > issues resolved. Also, it would give us a bit more time to test the
> > examples and review docs when they are ready. We can aim for "code freeze"
> > on Monday, with a release on Wednesday?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> >> To: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> >> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, 9 January, 2014 4:26:25 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Release next Monday or Tuesday
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> >>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> >>> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> Sent: Thursday, 9 January, 2014 4:20:57 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Release next Monday or Tuesday
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 1/9/2014 10:21 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> >>>> Would be good to have a chance to read through docs before we submit.
> >>>> Also
> >>>> there's at least a few issues outstanding that I think should be fixed
> >>>> prior to alpha release:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Working on it.
> >>>
> >>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-251
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> What is "Installation missing for clients"?
> >>
> >> In admin console for applications you can go to installation and get the
> >> json
> >> snippet required to configure the adapter. We need the same for oauth
> >> clients.
> >>
> >> I can probably sort out those 3 issues tomorrow. The rest of the issues in
> >> JIRA with ff M1 can be pushed back IMO.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> >>>>> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 7 January, 2014 8:20:24 PM
> >>>>> Subject: [keycloak-dev] Release next Monday or Tuesday
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll bang hard on the documentation this week so we can release Alpha 1
> >>>>> next Monday.  Let not commit an PRs after Thursday please!
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Bill Burke
> >>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> >>>>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
> >>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Bill Burke
> >>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> >>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> keycloak-dev mailing list
> >> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >>
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>