[keycloak-dev] Do we still need project-integrations/aerogear-ups

[Matthias Wessendorf]

I think reproducing the mentioned issue was easier w that example. Perhaps
for you on fixing/testing as well.
But there is IMO no real need for it. Just a convenience


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com> wrote:

> No strong feelings, just checking if it's actually still in use, so if you
> still use it we'll keep it ;)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 10:38:37 AM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Do we still need
> project-integrations/aerogear-ups
> >
> > It helped us to for getting the UPS integration running.
> >
> > I used it basically as a 'simple way' to describe error, instead of
> having
> > to mess around w/ UPS, as things are reproducable w/ the KC src base
> (e.g.
> > KEYCLOAK-556 );
> > But if you have strong feelings around deleting it, go for it
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Can we delete project-integrations/aerogear-ups, or do we still need
> it?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20140711/f81e55bc/attachment.html