[keycloak-dev] Reset password and verify email links are to long

Stian Thorgersen stian at redhat.com
Wed Jul 16 08:56:09 EDT 2014



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 July, 2014 1:47:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Reset password and verify email links are to long
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/16/2014 8:43 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/16/2014 6:54 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> >> This is probably what you've said already Bill, but just to make sure:
> >>
> >> 1. Associate the required information to create a token from an access
> >> code with the user session (basically what's in AccessCodeEntry now)
> >> 2. The code that is sent as the query param only contains id, session-id,
> >> timestamp
> >> 3. Once we receive a code to swap for a token we remove the information
> >> added in 1 from the user session and use this to generate the token
> >>
> >> Couple questions:
> >>
> >> * Do we do this just for emails? or also for the code sent in login
> >> redirects?
> >> * Do we really need session-id and timestamp, or isn't id enough?
> >
> > Actually, do we even need a specific access code?  Even for OAuth 2
> > flow?  Just pass around the session id.  All information to validate
> > calls, especially accessCodeToToken[1] should be in the UserSession.
> > You just have to make absolutely sure you are validating redirect uri
> > and client-id to guard against swapping.
> >
> 
> Actually maybe the access code should be a digitally signed session-id?
>   Then you're fully protected from people guessing session-ids.
> Granted, the window to guess is relatively short.  *shrug* I don't know. :)

It can't just be session-id as there's multiple apps/clients per-session, also even multiple logins for a single app. How about session-id + client-id + timestamp, and we sign it as well?

> 
> >> * Isn't this pretty much just going back to state-full TokenManager except
> >> we're saving it in the UserSession instead of TokenManager itself?
> >>
> >
> > Yup. :)  LOL!!!!!
> >
> > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.3
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list