[keycloak-dev] Additional things to consider for 1.0.final
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Thu Jul 17 09:30:18 EDT 2014
On 7/17/2014 9:20 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
>> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 17 July, 2014 2:14:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Additional things to consider for 1.0.final
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/2014 8:55 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>> As we didn't have enough things to do last minute I come up with more
>>> things which I think we should do for 1.0.final:
>>>
>>> 1. Configure JPA through keycloak-server.json instead of persistence.xml
>>>
>>> This would be super simple to do, and would let us have a single
>>> persistence.xml for everything (testsuite, server, project-integrations).
>>> Everything worthy of configuring in persistence.xml (including datasource)
>>> can be passed in the Map overrides when creating the EntityManagerFactory.
>>>
>>
>> -1. I don't think learning a new configuration format for
>> persistence.xml is user friendly. Users would have to translate the
>> Hibernate documentation to our json format.
>
> It would support both, configuration can either be done through persistence.xml or keycloak-server.json. We could use the same property names, so it would just be a matter of putting it in keycloak-server instead of properties in persistence.xml.
>
> Also, why do our users need to understand Hibernate/JPA just to be able to configure what data-source to use for Keycloak?
>
Actually, you're right. We wouldn't even need a persistence.xml file.
We wouldn't need even any JPA specific settings in keycloak-server.json
by default too, right?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list