[keycloak-dev] urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob always valid?

[Stian Thorgersen]

Not sure what you mean, but if you're asking if a login request can have '..?redirect_uri=urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob' without 'urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob' listed as a valid redirect_uri on the application/client, then no.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 May, 2014 4:32:06 PM
> Subject: [keycloak-dev] urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob always valid?
> 
> If the client has a redirect uri of urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob, this is
> always acceptable?
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>