[keycloak-dev] Issues with the first login flow
Stian Thorgersen
stian at redhat.com
Wed May 21 11:00:07 EDT 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gabriel Cardoso" <gcardoso at redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>, keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 May, 2014 3:46:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Issues with the first login flow
>
> The problem I see is that people don’t read these messages. They assume that
> it is an error or something.
>
> I think the text above (some different from a feedback message) is more
> effective, and the extra field (username) helps on the differentiation. It
> could be plain text instead of an input.
That doesn't make sense to me - if folks are not going to read an error message, they are certainly not going to read plain text that doesn't stand out at all.
>
> I don’t believe this solution will solve the problem.
>
> Gabriel
>
>
> On May 21, 2014, at 4:37 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > I added it the way you said, and to me it doesn't stand out at all. How
> > about moving the notification bubble we already have to be in-line with
> > the form? That would also make all other notifications, such as invalid
> > username/password stand out more as well. See attached screenshot for how
> > that would look like.
> >
> > Adding a disabled input field for username doesn't make sense at all to me.
> > An input field is not informative, it's an input field and hence something
> > users expect to fill in.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Gabriel Cardoso" <gcardoso at redhat.com>
> >> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> >> Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>, keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 20 May, 2014 7:11:20 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Issues with the first login flow
> >>
> >>> He's not logged-in, those are actions that the user are required to do
> >>> prior to be logged-in. The user will however have to identify himself
> >>> with
> >>> username/password (and totp if configured) prior to being permitted to do
> >>> those actions. The actions a user can be asked to do as part of a login
> >>> is
> >>> not just limited to updating the password. These can include:
> >>>
> >>> * Configure TOTO
> >>> * Update password
> >>> * Verify email
> >>> * Update profile
> >>>
> >>> And, possible more to come in the future.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the clarification.
> >>
> >>> Text above we already have in a notification thing, but I don't have a
> >>> problem with moving that above the form. The username input field doesn't
> >>> make sense at all, as the user is not able to change that at this stage.
> >>
> >> Cool, so please put the text inside a <p class=“form-info”></p>.
> >>
> >> The username field is to differentiate more this page from the login page
> >> (3
> >> fields are different than 2 :) I don’t see it as a problem, it is
> >> informative and the user can’t change it (no danger). So now it is up to
> >> you.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Gabriel
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Gabriel
> >>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Gabriel Cardoso
> >>>> User Experience Designer @ Red Hat
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Gabriel Cardoso
> >> User Experience Designer @ Red Hat
> >>
> > <login-notification.png>
>
> ---
> Gabriel Cardoso
> User Experience Designer @ Red Hat
>
>
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list