[keycloak-dev] Next step performance

[Stian Thorgersen]

FIY I've started looking at caching FreeMarker templates and cache-control for static content

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 30 May, 2014 12:29:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Next step performance
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/30/2014 6:06 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > Sent invite for Monday in Zimbra (15pm GMT). If that's not suitable let me
> > know.
> >
> > A few more areas to look at:
> >
> > * Profile to find crappy code
> > * Tune FreeMarker and themes
> > * Sharding / sticky sessions - this is probably for later, but I'd like to
> > discuss it in the hangout
> >
> > A few comments on database caching:
> >
> > * We may need to do this in stages
> >     - 2nd level cache for beta-2?
> >     - Something more advanced in after 1.0.final
> > * I'd don't like the idea of us re-inventing the wheel
> >     - Caching has a lot of complex considerations (node discovery,
> >     fail-over, node recovery, invalidation, lan/wan, jta, etc.)
> 
> I know and agree and have experience with this.  But, these traditional
> caches just don't work well in many environments.
> 
> > * I really like the idea of having a cache model provider that delegates to
> > another model for persistence / this is definitively the way to go IMO
> > * User sessions needs to separate considerations, specifically I think we
> > can come up with something clever to minimise the writes required
> >
> 
> Yes, User sessions are a special case.
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>