[keycloak-dev] security proxy prototype

Bill Burke bburke at redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 10:58:10 EST 2014



On 11/21/2014 10:35 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 8:48 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> On 11/21/2014 8:25 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>>> As a side effect, we now have a pure Undertow adapter.
>>> I thought I already refactored our Undertow adapter to be pure?
>>>
>> I didn't see an adapter.  Just abstract classes.
>>
> Ah, you are right.  I got rid of the dependency on the Servlet API but I
> never provided a concrete extension of UndertowKeycloakAuthMech.
>
> I've actually got one on my local box.  Should I add it to the Undertow
> adapter?

I already did it and already use it in the proxy.


-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list