[keycloak-dev] Notes on KEYCLOAK-795: Move Auth Server into KC subsystem
Stan Silvert
ssilvert at redhat.com
Fri Oct 31 14:42:34 EDT 2014
On 10/31/2014 4:15 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> Looks good to me. We should include this in Beta1.
>
> A few comments/questions:
>
> * Can we support enabling confidential transport-guarantee (auth-server/WEB-INF/web.xml) without cracking open the WAR? This seems to be the last requirement for an exploded WAR
Looking this over, it seems pretty important! I think I'd like to go
ahead and implement this option before we merge. I should be able to do
that and also finish the doc updates by the middle of next week. Just
go ahead and release the Beta if you want. I can catch the next release
train.
I plan to implement this as a boolean value on on the server called
"https-required". Is there a better name for it?
<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:keycloak:1.0">
<auth-server name="foo">
<enabled>true</enabled>
<web-context>auth</web-context>
<https-required>true</https-required>
</auth-server>
</subsystem>
Should the default be false? I realize that the default in the
appliance dist is false, but should the default always be false?
If true, this will be automatically added to auth-server.war at deploy time:
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<user-data-constraint>
<transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
</user-data-constraint>
</security-constraint>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20141031/3a9b4ec9/attachment.html
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list