[keycloak-dev] [aerogear-dev] Keycloak Ionic / Cordova theme

Marek Posolda mposolda at redhat.com
Mon Sep 22 03:06:39 EDT 2014 

I wonder there might be some more browser javascript properties, which 
might help to detect client type. For example screen.width (with low 
values, there is quite big chance that you are using mobile device). 
Also it might be useful to detect if device support touch screen or not 
(not sure if there is some reliable way though). If we go this way, it 
might be also helpful to cache the detected client type into cookie, so 
detection doesn't need to be done in each request.

Marek

On 19.9.2014 16:27, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
>> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Friday, 19 September, 2014 3:19:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] [aerogear-dev] Keycloak Ionic / Cordova theme
>>
>> Browsers set the User-Agent header.  Wouldn't it be better to pick the
>> theme based on the user-agent header?  I don't remember if browsers also
>> automatically push locale info.
> User-Agent header is useful, but I think we may something in addition, for example when form is displayed embedded instead of full page redirect. Not 100% sure user-agent is always reliable either.
>
> Browsers set's Accept-Language header, but apparently it's not always reliable so it's only recommended to use it as a starting point. I've got a proposal for internationalization support here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-301
>
>> On 9/19/2014 8:53 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>> Another thing we should consider is embedding of the login form. Instead of
>>> doing a full-page redirect we could allow embedding using a modal and/or
>>> iframe. In that situation you'd also want it to look slightly different
>>> than the full-page version.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Lukáš Fryč" <lukas at fryc.eu>
>>>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>,
>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Friday, 19 September, 2014 2:49:43 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] [aerogear-dev] Keycloak Ionic / Cordova theme
>>>>
>>>> I completely agree that the SSO should have same look for all applications
>>>> using one realm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, a customization can be partially achieved just with CSS tweaks, but
>>>> it
>>>> doesn't have to meet all requirements and further per-platform tweaks may
>>>> be necessary.
>>>>
>>>> In the Ionic demo above I was to meet 70% cases by using built-in CSS
>>>> classes. The rest had to be hard-coded. We can either extend CSS classes
>>>> coverage or allow higher customization with e.g. theming per variants.
>>>>
>>>> This feature would make "theming per-platform" easier, I could achieve
>>>> that
>>>> with pure CSS/HTML tweaks and media-queries anyway.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Lukáš Fryč" <lukas.fryc at gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>,
>>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, 19 September, 2014 1:30:21 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] [keycloak-dev]  Keycloak Ionic / Cordova
>>>>> theme
>>>>>> That would be awesome,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> do I read correctly that it is not possible at the moment? Should I
>>>>> create a
>>>>>> feature request?
>>>>> Currently we can only configure the theme on a per-realm basis. With the
>>>>> exception of css media-types there's not currently any way to modify the
>>>>> l&f based on client (or client type).
>>>>>
>>>>> An alternative, which may make more sense, is to add multiple variants of
>>>>> a theme. So for example you could have a theme that has web, android,
>>>>> ios,
>>>>> etc variants. Then you have some way of specifying for the client what
>>>>> variant it is. The reason this may make more sense is so that the SSO
>>>>> login
>>>>> screen looks the same whichever application you come from.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example Acme Inc may have two applications (both with web, ios and
>>>>> android variants):
>>>>>
>>>>> * calendar
>>>>> * mail
>>>>>
>>>>> You want the login screen to be adapted to the variant of the apps. So
>>>>> the
>>>>> login screens can look different if you use a browser or if you use a
>>>>> mobile. What you don't want is the login screens to look different for
>>>>> the
>>>>> calendar and mail applications, as it's SSO you're not logging in to an
>>>>> app, you're looging in to a group of apps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we reliably detect what variant it is? Or does this have to be
>>>>> configured in the admin console on a per-client basis?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Stian Thorgersen < stian at redhat.com >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Lukáš Fryč" < lukas at fryc.eu >
>>>>>>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" < stian at redhat.com >
>>>>>>> Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" < aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, 19 September, 2014 1:18:19 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] [aerogear-dev] Keycloak Ionic / Cordova
>>>>> theme
>>>>>>> IMHO the SSO endpoint could either detect an incoming client (that
>>>>> would be
>>>>>>> rather complex)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> or simply allow user client preference. Can we allow more than one
>>>>> theme
>>>>>>> per realm and let the client app choohse?
>>>>>> Not sure what you mean, we always know which client is requesting the
>>>>> login
>>>>>> (it's the client_id query param). The client should only be used for one
>>>>>> variant of an application as well (so for an app that has a web, android
>>>>> and
>>>>>> ios variants, there should be 3 clients configured in KC). So there's no
>>>>>> problem providing an option to override the theme on a per-client basis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Stian Thorgersen < stian at redhat.com >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This raises the question. Should we allow overriding the theme on an
>>>>>>>> per-application basis?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would allow a better integration with the app, but on the other
>>>>> side
>>>>>>>> does it even make sense to login to a SSO realm that way?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>> From: "Erik Jan de Wit" < edewit at redhat.com >
>>>>>>>>> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >
>>>>>>>>> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, 19 September, 2014 8:08:02 AM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] Keycloak Ionic / Cordova theme
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looks very nice, will this integrate well with the work that
>>>>> Summers
>>>>>>>>> did?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 18 Sep,2014, at 20:19 , Lukáš Fryč < lukas.fryc at gmail.com >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah and off course, the source is here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/lfryc/keycloak/tree/ionic-styling
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Lukáš Fryč < lukas.fryc at gmail.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've started some work on a theme for Keycloak that would include
>>>>> Ionic
>>>>>>>>> Framework styling.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This makes sure that Ionic/Cordova demos that includes Keycloak has
>>>>>>>> smooth
>>>>>>>>> transition between application and login process / registration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See attached screenshots.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's still in early prototypal stage, so just just login,
>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> social (only google) fully works so far, but others can be simply
>>>>>>>> expanded.
>>>>>>>>> Feel free to use it in demos or so... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~ Lukas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list