[keycloak-dev] getting rid of master realm

[Bill Burke]

Sorry, makes sense now after reading your exchange.  In practice though, 
does it matter to have this split?  Is it not better to consolidate into 
one client?

On 12/7/2015 3:48 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
> +1. That's what we have now and it's good pattern IMO.
>
> Marek
>
> On 07/12/15 09:38, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> Should we not have one client for the roles that represents the
>> services (bearer-only), then have a separate clients for admin GUI and
>> CLI?
>>
>> On 7 December 2015 at 09:34, Marek Posolda <mposolda at redhat.com
>> <mailto:mposolda at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 03/12/15 20:06, Bill Burke wrote:
>>     > * We can remove the realm-management client in each realm and
>>     just merge
>>     > the roles into security-admin-console.
>>     Not sure about this one TBH. Also in 1.7 we introduced the "admin-cli"
>>     client, which is used for direct-grants and has scope to
>>     realm-management similarly like security-admin-console. The
>>     security-admin-console is used for UI of admin console (javascript
>>     client) when admin-cli is used for direct access to admin REST
>>     endpoints
>>     for example from admin-client.
>>
>>     Marek
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     keycloak-dev mailing list
>>     keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>>
>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com