[keycloak-dev] From 1.2->2.0
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Wed Feb 18 15:41:29 EST 2015
That will be my next task. Currently I'm focused on claims which will
be done this week or next.
I want to bring in PL SAML code soon, because it effects claim mapping.
I'm writing an SPI so that the admin can write a protocol mapper that
can change the SAML document however they like.
On 2/18/2015 8:35 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> When are you planning to move PL SAML code to KC (at least types and parsers) ? The issue I mentioned will require a release and update of PL dependency in KC. Want to avoid that every time we find a similar issue.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:05:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] From 1.2->2.0
>
> I want to refactor the Builders I wrote so they can be user consumable.
> What I want to have is a SAML SPI in which the SPI interface is passed
> a Builder. Then the SPI plugin can modify the document however they
> want. We'll need something similar for OIDC.
>
> On 2/16/2015 6:48 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
>>> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:38:08 PM
>>> Subject: [keycloak-dev] From 1.2->2.0
>>>
>>> I think we still have a few major features to implement for 1.2 and
>>> maybe 1.3. After this I'd like to focus on Keycloak 2.0 things like:
>>>
>>> * Improving and nailing down our SPIs
>>> * Splitting up code into private and public models so we can restrict
>>> what APIs/SPIs we want to commercially support
>>> * Pulling in and refactoring PL Federation
>>
>> I've an issue [1] in the SAML parsers that needs a fix. I don't know what are your plans for this, but I think we can start moving PL SAML types and parsers to KC ? Do you want/need a refactoring for them ?
>>
>> Or the refactoring you always talk about is around the SAML processing logic ? Such as handlers, etc ...
>>
>> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-883
>>
>>> * Consolidating and improving our admin console UI
>>>
>>> Really starting improving the core of Keycloak knowing that Keycloak 2.0
>>> is what we're going to be supporting commercially for years and years
>>> going forward.
>>> --
>>> Bill Burke
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list