[keycloak-dev] Simple mode?

[Stian Thorgersen]

-1000

I can't see how this would help jboss.org guys? They have most complex deployment out there.

As fair as other JBoss projects go and allowing them to embed Keycloak into their projects, this is along the lines of what I proposed. Although this is proposing to change the behaviour of Keycloak not just remove features.

For other users I don't see the use-case. We should instead focus on making sure Keycloak has the required features and is easy to use.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:28:10 PM
> Subject: [keycloak-dev] Simple mode?
> 
> Conversations with jboss.org guys got me thinking.  Should we have a
> "simple mode" for Keycloak where there is no concept of a client,
> application, or roles?  In this case,
> 
> * applications don't need session mgmt or single log out
> * All applications are hosted under the same domain i.e  *.jboss.org
> (issues.jboss.org, forums.jboss.org, etc...)
> * applications just need to know if 1) the user is logged in, 2) the
> username/id
> 
> So, "simple mode" would be:
> 
> * No applications/client panel
> * No role pages anywhere
> * Realm would have a global javascript referable cookie that contained
> basic information (userid, username, full name).  The domain and path
> would be configurable from admin console
> * Realm would have a list of valid redirect URI patterns.
> * Realm would have a default redirect page for unsolicited logins.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>