[keycloak-dev] 1.2.beta1 planning, need you to defer things

[Stian Thorgersen]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 12 March, 2015 1:57:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.beta1 planning, need you to defer things
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/12/2015 1:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > I'd like to reopen KEYCLOAK-311 as IMO it's not solved. This is not
> > referring to the claim mapping work you've done, it's something else.
> >
> 
> I opened two jiras.  One, a "claim validation" jira and another
> broker->Usermodel mappers.  That should have covered what 311 is not doing.

Not IMO. We really need to have something that defines how the internal user profile looks like, attribute validation, what attributes are required, etc.. Also, I really don't think we should require users to modify registration screens and admin console if all they want to do is for example to add a DOB field.

> 
> > Before we can do a release we need to make sure that database migration
> > works (I know they don't atm as social providers and social links are
> > lost). We also need to add transformation of JSON exports and
> > representations so older versions can be imported into 1.2.0.Beta1.
> >
> 
> Not sure, but json imports from older versions should be backwards
> compatible.  We're just doing migrations via json export/import right?

No, we migrate the database directly. https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/misc/UpdatingDatabaseSchema.md

> 
> >>
> >> I'm going to try and close existing bugs and implement features needed
> >> for jboss.org guys over the next 2 weeks as well as test out master to
> >> make sure things still work.
> >
> > With regards to jboss.org guys we shouldn't just add features because they
> > request it. Take for example KEYCLOAK-1045, which was easily solved with
> > we already have. Another one is KEYCLOAK-1051, which I think is a horrible
> > idea.
> >
> 
> I don't want to just add features either, but some of their things are
> valid...i.e. finding out if a user is logged and who they are without
> doing all the token stuff.

That's exactly one of the things that are not necessary, I've added a POC that uses keycloak.js, which they where happy with. See KEYCLOAK-1045 and http://stianst.github.io/jbossorg/index.html.

> 
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>