[keycloak-dev] User apps and HttpClient
Marko Strukelj
mstrukel at redhat.com
Fri May 22 03:38:49 EDT 2015
That's a great solution :)
I suppose most / all? of adapter modules should also be marked as internal modules, so that there is a warning in the log if a user pulls them in as dependencies.
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marko Strukelj" <mstrukel at redhat.com>
> > To: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, 21 May, 2015 10:56:40 PM
> > Subject: [keycloak-dev] User apps and HttpClient
> >
> > We package examples with jboss-deployment-structure.xml that looks like
> > this:
> >
> >
> > <jboss-deployment-structure>
> > <deployment>
> > <dependencies>
> > <module name="org.apache.httpcomponents"/>
> > </dependencies>
> > </deployment>
> > </jboss-deployment-structure>
> >
> >
> > If we drop a .war containing this into Wildfly 9 (distribution/server-dist
> > -
> > ATM distribution/demo-dist, and distribution/adapters/wildfly-adapter-zip
> > look buggy as they still use slot=4.3), things are fine.
> >
> > However, if we dropped this into Wildfly 8 with keycloak adapter modules
> > using org.apache.httpcomponents slot=4.3, we get a java.lang.LinkageError
> > as
> > soon as some Keycloak logic is triggered by user app.
> >
> > The question: how come jboss modules isolation doesn’t kick in and allow
> > keycloak adapter modules to use slot=4.3 while at the same time user app
> > (our examples) uses slot=main?
> >
> > The answer is that org.keycloak.adapters.HttpClientBuilder which seems to
> > be
> > our helper class for org.apache.httpcomponents inevitably leaks the version
> > of HttpClient its module refers to - can’t be any other way (unless we
> > change the code to use client app’s classloader - opening a can of worms).
> > Any user app using HttpClientBuilder.build() method receives an instance of
> > HttpClient loaded through org.keycloak.keycloak-adapter-core module, and
> > transitively through org.apache.httpcomponents referred to therein.
> >
> > Any attempt of an application (.war) to package its own httpcomponents
> > jars,
> > or to refer to a different jboss module than the exact one referred to by
> > org.keycloak.keycloak-adapter-core will result in ‘catastrophic failure’.
> > Example:
> >
> >
> > HttpClient client = new
> > HttpClientBuilder().disableTrustManager().build();
> >
> >
> > HttpClient on the left is loaded by app’s classloader. The one returned by
> > build() on the right is loaded by org.keycloak.keycloak-adapter-core
> > module’s version of httpcomponents. If it’s not the same classloader (jboss
> > module) on both sides loading HttpClient you get a LinkageError.
>
> HttpClientBuilder is an internal helper class and shouldn't be used directly
> by applications. We just need to rewrite the examples to not use it and
> Bob's your uncle the problem is no longer ;)
>
> >
> >
> > In light of this I wonder if it wasn’t the best solution to reexport
> > org.apache.httpcomponents to .wars by default, thereby removing the
> > necessity to package jboss-deployment-structure.xml at all, and ensuring
> > that user application always uses the proper module.
> >
> > Currently jboss-deployment-structure.xml is required for wildfly / as7, and
> > is a nuisance, especially as it has to be different (refer to slot=4.3) for
> > Wildfly 8.
> >
> > If using HttpClientBuilder is supposed to be completely optional, we could
> > maybe add configuration to keycloak subsystem to control exposing it to all
> > or specific secure deployments.
> >
> > We could simply add another common attribute that can be used in <realm>
> > and
> > <secure-deployment>. We could expose it by default and have something like:
> >
> > <expose-httpcomponents>false</expose-httpcomponents>
> >
> > to inhibit exposing it if a situation calls for it.
> >
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list