[keycloak-dev] Identity Broker login flow

Marek Posolda mposolda at redhat.com
Fri Nov 20 11:57:55 EST 2015


Yes, however the new "First Broker Login" flow I've added is triggered 
just when there is no Keycloak user already linked to IdentityProvider. 
In case that there is already some Keycloak user linked to 
identityProvider identity, the flow is not executed. Should it be 
changed to trigger flow after each broker login? I didn't want to do 
that as there were no use-cases (until now) . And always trigger the 
flow might require another browser redirect..

Marek

On 20/11/15 17:41, Bill Burke wrote:
> Oh, I thought our broker flows happened after the user logged into the 
> external IDP?
>
> On 11/20/2015 11:18 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>> Yep. I know :-\
>>
>> As usually, the most proper solution requires most of the changes and
>> refactoring...
>>
>> For this particular case, I wonder if Dane can use the approach with
>> implement IdentityProviderMapper to redirect to OTP login. This is
>> workaround though (IdentityProviderMapper is likely not designed for the
>> usecases like this), however I think it should work. This won't require
>> any changes in existing Keycloak code.
>>
>> I can introduce "post-broker-login" flow, but not sure if it's something
>> we should support OOTB. I don't know if it's useful for more people. So
>> I would rather skip adding post-broker-login as "authentication levels"
>> will be more proper and more generic solution IMO.
>>
>> Marek
>>
>>
>> On 20/11/15 16:05, Bill Burke wrote:
>>> All something we want to do, but do we have time?  Very soon we need to
>>> start focusing on cleaning up the APIs/SPIs, documentation, improving
>>> UI, performance, and the tons of minor problems people are 
>>> experiencing.
>>>
>>> On 11/20/2015 3:45 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>>>> I wonder if we should address this together with reducing number of
>>>> redirects ( https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2098 ) and also
>>>> support for "authentication levels" . We can encapsulate all the state
>>>> of authentication in ClientSession. If someone refreshes the page, we
>>>> will retrieve the ClientSession from the code and the current state of
>>>> execution will be retrieved from ClientSession itself.
>>>>
>>>> ClientSession will also encapsulate all the state of authentication
>>>> after authentication is finished. For example there will be 
>>>> "cookie" if
>>>> ClientSession was authenticated through cookie, "password, otp" if
>>>> clientSession was authenticated through password + otp or
>>>> "broker-facebook" if it was authenticated through Facebook. There will
>>>> be also timestamps of when each successful authentication happened. 
>>>> The
>>>> state will be partially saved in UserSession, so if clientSession was
>>>> authenticated through cookie, it can retrieve from userSession when 
>>>> the
>>>> "real" authentication happened etc.
>>>>
>>>> This will allow us to support periodic re-authentication, 
>>>> authentication
>>>> levels and different requirements for "authentication level" for
>>>> individual application. For example at each SSO login or refresh, we
>>>> will be able to:
>>>> - ask user for re-authenticate through OTP every 30 minutes
>>>> - ask user for re-authenticate through OTP if he was authenticated
>>>> through Facebook broker
>>>> - ask user for re-authenticate through OTP if application required 
>>>> that
>>>> with some magic parameter (AFAIK both OIDC or SAML has some parameters
>>>> for specify authentication levels)
>>>>
>>>> Marek
>>>>
>>>> On 20/11/15 08:41, Marek Posolda wrote:
>>>>> You're right, we don't have this right now. I don't know if it's
>>>>> something we should support OOTB. The idea of broker login is, that
>>>>> you delegate authentication to another SSO/social server. Once the
>>>>> second server say "Ok, user is authenticated", we treat him as
>>>>> authenticated on Keycloak side too. Isn't it the more proper option
>>>>> for your usecase to use OTP on the second server side instead?
>>>>>
>>>>> Another option is to implement IdentityProviderMapper and in
>>>>> "updateBrokeredUser" method, you will redirect user to OTP login.
>>>>> Could you try this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If we want to support another login flow triggered after each broker
>>>>> login (which I am not convinced TBH), we can either:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Introduce "post-broker-login" flow, which will be configurable per
>>>>> IdentityProvider. By default, it will be empty .
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Use just one flow, which will be triggered after each broker login
>>>>> (current "first broker login" flow is triggered only if
>>>>> federatedIdentity doesn't yet exist in Keycloak). In this case, the
>>>>> current "first broker login" flow will need to be renamed to "broker
>>>>> login" and more logic will need to be moved from 
>>>>> IdentityBrokerService
>>>>> to the flow itself. The disadvantage of this option is, that it may
>>>>> always require another redirect to trigger authentication flows. But
>>>>> we're trying to reduce the number of redirects (
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2098 )
>>>>>
>>>>> Marek
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/11/15 00:06, Dane Barentine wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m trying to add a custom authenticator and it appears that that
>>>>>> there is no way to insert it in the flow if it’s a brokered IDP 
>>>>>> login
>>>>>> where the linked Keycloak account already exists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it’s a local Keycloak user I can use the Browser flow and if it’s
>>>>>> a new brokered user the First Broker Login flow will execute. But I
>>>>>> don’t see a flow that would allow me to insert something like OTP
>>>>>> after a brokered login of an existing user.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I’m just missing it let me know but I think there needs to be 
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> sort of flow for brokered logins that runs on both existing and new
>>>>>> users. For new users it would run after the First Broker Login flow.
>>>>>> Or better yet maybe a flow that would allow things such as OTP to
>>>>>> happen after any brokered or local login. That way it wouldn’t have
>>>>>> to be configured in multiple flows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dane
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>
>>
>



More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list