[keycloak-dev] What to do about Java admin client
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Tue Apr 5 08:19:15 EDT 2016
On 4/5/2016 7:47 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>
>>> 2) Use JAX-RS 2 client
>> +1
>>
>> But it will be good if people have possibility to configure the
>> details of underlying Apache HTTP Client (connection pooling,
>> connection/socket timeouts, tls etc). If it's possible to achieve
>> it and use JAX-RS 2 client at the same time, it will be cool.
>> Otherwise if we need to choose just one of these, the
>> "configurability" of Apache HTTP client is more important IMO.
>>
>>
>> Sticking with RestEasy Client makes the assumption that all users use
>> other JBoss projects. We know that's not true as Tomcat, Jetty and
>> Spring adapters all have a lot of use. IMO we should either convert
>> to JAX-RS 2 client or use Apache HTTP client directly (I'm not to
>> keen on that though).
> At least we may just have possibility to inject underlying
> javax.ws.rs.client.Client during creation of admin-client. So if
> someone is on resteasy and wants to tweak Apache HTTP Client, he can
> use RestEasy API to build client by himself and inject it. If he's
> using some other library, he would need to use it's API to build
> client (and possibly configure connection pooling etc in library
> specific way).
>
If you're using Tomcat, Spring or whatever, anything JBoss is evil and
they can't co-exist? That's ridiculous. You're really going to stub
out every single piece of the REST api and/or write your own tool? No....
We revise the rest interface. Either use Resteasy, or they can write
their own clients.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160405/9365367a/attachment.html
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list