[keycloak-dev] Bug in UI?

[Marek Posolda]

Maybe if you clear browser cache it will help?

We have version in URI of static resources (CSS, HTML, freemarker 
templates etc), so if you work just with released versions like 
"1.8.0.Final" or "1.9.1.Final", the browser cache is not an issue as 
it's different URI for each version. But you're doing some development 
and building KC from sources, so if there are changes, the version is 
still "1.9.2-SNAPSHOT", hence you can see stale content of some file 
through your browser cache.

Marek

On 12/04/16 17:12, Guus der Kinderen wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I didn't try master yet, because I will be 
> deploying the upcoming 1.9.2 (master is currently at 2.0.0).
>
>  - Guus
>
> On 12 April 2016 at 17:03, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org 
> <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Guus, everything is working here for me. Maybe you should try
>     it against the latest changes on master?
>
>     On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:10 AM Guus der Kinderen
>     <guus.der.kinderen at gmail.com <mailto:guus.der.kinderen at gmail.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I did not try to reproduce this on master branch, but got it
>         twice now on 1.9.x. The branch HEAD is
>         commit b01f522acea6b6c5c6f487dc626a24ca928da77d
>
>         After I build the distribution...
>
>         $ mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pdistribution
>
>
>         ... extract the distribution ...
>
>         $ cd /distribution/server-dist/target/
>         $ tar zxvf keycloak-1.9.2.Final-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
>
>
>         ... and start a standalone instance ...
>
>         $ cd /keycloak-1.9.2.Final-SNAPSHOT/bin
>         $ ./standalone.sh
>
>         ... open the webpage at http://localhost:8080/auth
>         ... create a new user
>         ... login to the administration console with that user
>         ... go to the list of clients
>         ... and open (or click 'edit') on any of the clients
>
>         Then the webpage that I'm looking at appears to be broken. I'm
>         looking at the template itself, I think.
>
>         Is this me, or can someone reproduce this?
>
>          - Guus
>         _______________________________________________
>         keycloak-dev mailing list
>         keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160413/66064fc2/attachment.html