[keycloak-dev] Renamed package because of fuse
Stian Thorgersen
sthorger at redhat.com
Wed Apr 13 14:03:26 EDT 2016
Rename or merge either works for me. We need it resolved asap though. Yes,
we're going to have to re-test all adapters and examples because of this :(
On 13 April 2016 at 18:18, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:
> Wait! Maybe we should just merge adapter-spi and adapter-spi-public. Its
> not that big a deal to have adapter-spi be public.
>
>
> On 4/13/2016 12:10 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>
> Found that fuse adapter doesn't work due to adapters packaging changes.
> JIRA is here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2816
>
> Among some minor things, the biggest issue is that osgi doesn't work
> properly if there are 2 modules with classes inside same package. There is
> "adapter-spi" and "adapter-spi-public" modules with both having classes
> inside package "org.keycloak.adapters.spi". So the easiest solution was
> just to rename the package.
>
> There was possibility to rename either:
> (1) the one inside "adapter-spi"
> (2) or the one inside "adapter-spi-public" .
>
> I've actually chose the (1) and renamed the one inside "adapter-spi" to
> "org.keycloak.adapters.spi .internal". Only reason is that there might be
> some users, who are using classes AuthenticationError or LogoutError, so
> they don't need to change the code of their applications because upgrade.
> On the other hand the (2) (rename the package inside "adapter-spi-public"
> to "org.keycloak.adapters.spi.public" and keep the one inside "adapter-spi"
> unrenamed) have the advantage of better consistency among module names and
> package names. So if you rather want me to go this way, let me know and I
> can change it.
>
> For now, the PR against 1.9.x for path1 is here:
> <https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614>
> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614 . There are 72 affected
> files because of package renamed, but all of them are inside adapters. Will
> send PR against master too if you agree with the path1. Not sure if we
> rather need to retest all the examples because of the change... :-(
>
> Marek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing listkeycloak-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160413/05e20a80/attachment.html
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list