[keycloak-dev] max entry default for realm cache?
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Fri Apr 29 10:07:45 EDT 2016
sessions aren't a problem as we check for idleness.
@Stian, no there is not a problem with the current setup. I was worried
that realm cache was bounded and was just making sure.
On 4/28/2016 9:43 PM, Fabricio Milone wrote:
> As per the documentation on
> http://infinispan.org/docs/8.0.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_more_defaults
> and keycloak standalone.xml file, I can see that none of those caches
> have eviction enabled.
>
> I'm just wondering why is the realm cache the one you are asking for.
> Wouldn't be more dangerous in terms of memory the sessions or users
> cache instead?
>
>
> On 29 April 2016 at 07:44, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com
> <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> What is the max entry default for realm cache? Is it unbounded?
> I'm looking at infinispan docs and it seems the default eviction
> strategy is nothing.
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Fabricio Milone*
> Developer
> *
> *
> *
> Shine Consulting *
>
> 30/600 Bourke Street
>
> Melbourne VIC 3000
>
> T: 03 8488 9939
>
> M: 04 3200 4006
>
>
> www.shinetech.com <http://www.shinetech.com/>/*a*/ passion for excellence
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160429/0c5d4b73/attachment.html
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list