[keycloak-dev] changes to KeycloakTransaction and KeycloakTransactionManager API

[Stian Thorgersen]

I don't have a big problem with it, but I don't see the need to do it. Is
it not just a convenience thing to be able to get it directly from the
transaction object rather than having to get the separate transaction
manager object?

On 25 July 2016 at 16:59, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:

> I want to simplify KeycloakTransaction interface a bit and remove the
> getRolbackOnly, setRollbackOnly, and isActive and only have them within
> KeycloakTransationManager.  I may have to refactor existing components
> to handle this.  See any issues?   All this is the continuous process of
> simplying our SPIs to make them easier to implement.
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160815/056c85fc/attachment.html