[keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down

Marek Posolda mposolda at redhat.com
Mon Aug 22 12:19:12 EDT 2016 

This looks better then my workaround of having long bash command to log 
"something" every 10 seconds. That worked fine as well, but didn't 
really look pretty :-)

BTV. instead of looking at another alternative for Travis, we can maybe 
spend the time to tune our testsuite? We have already JIRA for it 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3123 .

The advantage is, that it will help with the speed of build on our 
laptops too, not just with the speed of CI. I've personally ended to 
always run the build with "-DskipTests=true" on my laptop as it takes 
forever to build with tests.

Marek

On 17/08/16 08:46, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> I've tweaked the stroppy toddler a bit 
> (https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/3147). Ran that PR 5 times 
> and it passed every time, so hopefully it'll make it a bit more 
> stable. Still takes more than 1 hour to complete though.
>
> On 16 August 2016 at 16:06, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org 
> <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>> wrote:
>
>     There are some alternatives that we could try:
>
>     * https://www.cloudbees.com/partners/platform/red-hat
>     <https://www.cloudbees.com/partners/platform/red-hat>
>     *
>     https://developers.openshift.com/managing-your-applications/continuous-integration.html
>     <https://developers.openshift.com/managing-your-applications/continuous-integration.html>
>     * Make use of a beefy machine :)
>     * Or host Jenkins in some paid cloud infrastructure
>
>     If we don't have any volunteers, count me in.
>
>     On 2016-08-15, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>     > My opinion is that i HATE Travis! It's slow and has a tendency
>     to act like
>     > a stroppy toddler.
>     >
>     > Removing -q doesn't work because we then end up generating more
>     log than
>     > Travis allows which kills the build as well.
>     >
>     > We used to have the caching enabled, but it used to result in a
>     lot of
>     > issues. Can't quite remember the details though. Maybe we can
>     try it again.
>     >
>     > There's also travis_wait option that could work (
>     >
>     https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received
>     <https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received>
>     > ).
>     >
>     > My preference would be to migrate away from Travis and use
>     something more
>     > beefy that can run tests quicker.
>     >
>     > I'll need to figure out someone to look into it though. Any
>     volunteers?
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > On 28 July 2016 at 17:11, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva at redhat.com
>     <mailto:psilva at redhat.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     > > Let's see what Stian thinks about it :) For me, it is also an
>     option.
>     > >
>     > > ----- Original Message -----
>     > > From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno at abstractj.org
>     <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>>
>     > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com
>     <mailto:psilva at redhat.com>>
>     > > Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com
>     <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>>, "keycloak-dev" <
>     > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:45:35 PM
>     > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>     > >
>     > > Another alternative, but you might not enjoy it, is :)
>     > >
>     > > Before start building Keycloak, pre-download all the '.m2' dir
>     with
>     > > the dependencies required. Second alternative, is to try some
>     caching[1],
>     > > but it may
>     > > or may not work.
>     > >
>     > > [1] - https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/
>     <https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/>
>     > >
>     > > On 2016-07-27, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>     > > > As Bruno suggested, the problem is probably related with the
>     build
>     > > taking too long. If you look at the first command being executed:
>     > > >
>     > > >     mvn install -Pdistribution -DskipTests=true -B -V -q
>     > > >
>     > > > The -q option tells maven to run in quite mode and only show
>     errors.
>     > > Even in my laptop, if I run the command above it takes a bit
>     more time to
>     > > show any output (not too long, but more than usual). That may
>     explain that
>     > > message from Travis.
>     > > >
>     > > > Maybe we should remove -q and just log everything. That
>     could make the
>     > > builds more stable.
>     > > >
>     > > > I've forced a new build to your https://github.com/keycloak/
>     > > keycloak/pull/3079 (without changing anything to .travis.yml).
>     Now it is
>     > > running.
>     > > >
>     > > > ----- Original Message -----
>     > > > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com
>     <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>>
>     > > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com
>     <mailto:psilva at redhat.com>>, "Bruno Oliveira" <
>     > > bruno at abstractj.org <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>>
>     > > > Cc: "keycloak-dev" <keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 8:53:16 PM
>     > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>     > > >
>     > > > Wrong... :(  I still get this problem.
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > On 7/27/16 7:02 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>     > > > > I think Travis decided to not mess with Bill :)
>     > > > >
>     > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>     > > > > From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno at abstractj.org
>     <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>>
>     > > > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com
>     <mailto:psilva at redhat.com>>
>     > > > > Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com
>     <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>>, "keycloak-dev" <
>     > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:37:44 PM
>     > > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Seems like the balance of the Force was established again.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > On 2016-07-27, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>     > > > >> Got that error, but now the build was successful.
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>     > > > >> From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno at abstractj.org
>     <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>>
>     > > > >> To: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com
>     <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>>
>     > > > >> Cc: "keycloak-dev" <keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:01:47 PM
>     > > > >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> Seems like they are fully operational[1]. I believe that
>     this is the
>     > > > >> reason:
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> "No output has been received in the last 10 minutes, this
>     potentially
>     > > indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build
>     itself."
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> Based on my previous experiences, it happens when the
>     build takes too
>     > > > >> long. Not really sure if that's the root cause, but I can
>     help
>     > > > >> investigating it.
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> [1] - https://www.traviscistatus.com/
>     <https://www.traviscistatus.com/>
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> On 2016-07-27, Bill Burke wrote:
>     > > > >>> A lot of builds failing in initial setup
>     > > > >>>
>     > > > >>>
>     > > > >>> Bill
>     > > > >>>
>     > > > >>> _______________________________________________
>     > > > >>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>     > > > >>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     > > > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev>
>     > > > >> --
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> abstractj
>     > > > >> PGP: 0x84DC9914
>     > > > >> _______________________________________________
>     > > > >> keycloak-dev mailing list
>     > > > >> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     > > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev>
>     > > > > --
>     > > > >
>     > > > > abstractj
>     > > > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
>     > > >
>     > >
>     > > --
>     > >
>     > > abstractj
>     > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
>     > > _______________________________________________
>     > > keycloak-dev mailing list
>     > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev>
>     > >
>
>     --
>
>     abstractj
>     PGP: 0x84DC9914
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160822/1fa9da1a/attachment.html

More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list