[keycloak-dev] Admin client interfaces not implemented in services

[Stian Thorgersen]

I agree that would be better, but there's not a one to one mapping between
the admin client interfaces and the admin services, so not sure if this
would be possible at the moment without radically changing the client api.
We're also planning on re-doing the admin endpoints completely at some
point and introduce a much improved v2.

On 14 December 2016 at 01:27, Scott Rossillo <srossillo at smartling.com>
wrote:

> I’ve been doing some work around the admin client and endpoints. I noticed
> that org.keycloak.services.resources.admin.UsersResource does not
> implement the org.keycloak.admin.client.resource.UsersResource interface.
> Is there an intentional reason for this?
>
> It would be easier to keep the server implementation honest to the APIs if
> the interfaces were implemented plus simplify implementation discovery.
> Seems there are redundant POJOs as a result of this too.
>
> What do you guys think about modifying the admin service to implement the
> client interfaces?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> Scott Rossillo
> Smartling | Senior Software Engineer
> srossillo at smartling.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev