[keycloak-dev] i18n for Logging

Stan Silvert ssilvert at redhat.com
Mon Jan 18 10:45:42 EST 2016


On 1/18/2016 9:56 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 1/18/2016 8:25 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>> On 1/18/2016 3:02 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>> Looks good how you've done it.
>>>
>>> Bill is currently working on re-organizing code, but he's not going 
>>> to move anything from services. So can you finish up services and 
>>> send a PR for it? Then you can do the other logging once Bill is 
>>> completed.
>> Assuming nobody has an objection to the proposed format, I'll go 
>> ahead and finish services.
>
> Another thing to consider is DEBUG logging.  Do we want to localize 
> debug messages?
I grepped the WildFly code.  I could only find a handful of examples 
where somebody localized a debug message.  Looks like for the most part, 
their debug messages are not localized.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> On 15 January 2016 at 22:12, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com 
>>> <mailto:ssilvert at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I've completed a first stab at this using the JBoss logging
>>>     tools. Once merged we will have the ability to do i18n/l10n on
>>>     our log messages and also use message numbers.
>>>
>>>     Here is the commit to show you how it turns out converting the
>>>     log messages in KeycloakApplication:
>>>     https://github.com/ssilvert/keycloak/commit/54faba37cb4797fc337569899d8ac8eaa7f0ad1a#diff-72ce0a0a72ebd57f8627c059f7f1ea03R1
>>>
>>>     So, now a message coming from the KeycloakApplication class in
>>>     the services module looks like this:
>>>
>>>     15:29:31,515 INFO  [*org.keycloak.services*] (ServerService
>>>     Thread Pool -- 50)*KC-SERVICES0001*: Loading config from
>>>     c:\GitHub\keycloak\distribution\server-dist\target\keycloak-1.9.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT\standalone\configuration\keycloak-server.json
>>>
>>>     We need to decide how we want to structure this.  In WildFly, we
>>>     typically have one logger per maven module.  If you want to have
>>>     one logger per package then you would need to create a new
>>>     interface in each package, which gets hairy.
>>>
>>>     I do suggest that we prefix all of our messages with "KC-" or
>>>     something else that is unique across products.  Also, we should
>>>     standardize the "padding" for the message numbers.
>>>
>>>     Another possibility is to have all keycloak messages start with
>>>     "KEYCLOAK".  This would mean that we would need for each module
>>>     to reserve a number range.  There are annotations to enforce
>>>     this if we want to go that route.  The downside is that
>>>     somewhere we need to maintain a registry.  I think WildFly did
>>>     this but eventually abandoned it.  Notice that WildFly messages
>>>     are like "WFLYUT" for Undertow or "WFLYJSF" for JSF.
>>>
>>>     BTW, localization works nicely.  Just add a bundle for a new
>>>     language.  The tool even creates a skeleton properties file for you.
>>>
>>>     If you want more details on the i18n framework, see
>>>     https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/JBossLoggingTooling.
>>>
>>>     Stan
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>     keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160118/c8112828/attachment.html 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list