[keycloak-dev] Keycloak on Wildfly 10
Christian Beikov
christian.beikov at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 10:07:50 EST 2016
As I wrote, when you change the Undertow version in the parent pom, a
build will generate a compilation error when using the Undertow version
that is used in Wildfly 10 which would be 1.3.x.
I encountered the following exception in the Undertow adapters because
of binary incompatibilities between Undertow 1.2.x and 1.3.x:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
io.undertow.server.Connectors.ungetRequestBytes(Lio/undertow/server/HttpServerExchange;[Lorg/xnio/Pooled;)V
at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.SavedRequest.tryRestoreRequest(SavedRequest.java:112)
at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletSessionTokenStore.restoreRequest(ServletSessionTokenStore.java:119)
at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletSessionTokenStore.isCached(ServletSessionTokenStore.java:67)
at
org.keycloak.adapters.RequestAuthenticator.authenticate(RequestAuthenticator.java:88)
at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.AbstractUndertowKeycloakAuthMech.keycloakAuthenticate(AbstractUndertowKeycloakAuthMech.java:110)
at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletKeycloakAuthMech.authenticate(ServletKeycloakAuthMech.java:92)
Regards,
Christian
Am 21.01.2016 um 16:00 schrieb Stian Thorgersen:
> When we tested it, it worked. So I need more details from you to
> reproduce this.
>
> On 21 January 2016 at 14:50, Christian Beikov
> <christian.beikov at gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I deploy the adapter by overlaying/copying the adapter modules
> into my Wildfly.
>
> I understand that you support older Wildfly versions too, but I
> guess you have to create a separate adapter for Wildfly 10 then.
> You can easily see that there are incompatibilities between
> Undertow 1.2.x and 1.3.x which will result in a failed compilation
> if you change the Undertow version in the parent pom for testing
> purposes.
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
>
> Am 21.01.2016 um 14:44 schrieb Stian Thorgersen:
>> BTW we support older versions of WildFly as well as 10, so it's
>> not as simple as upgrading the undertow version
>>
>> On 21 January 2016 at 14:43, Stian Thorgersen
>> <sthorger at redhat.com <mailto:sthorger at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> How are you deploying the adapter and what adapter are you
>> using? We have tested the adapter with WildFly 10 (Keycloak
>> 1.8.0.CR1 was tested on 10.0.0.CR5) and it worked fine.
>>
>> On 21 January 2016 at 14:30, Christian Beikov
>> <christian.beikov at gmail.com
>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to deploy Keycloak 1.8.0.CR1 to Wildfly
>> 10.0.0.CR4 but there
>> are some problems with that.
>> You are compiling against Undertow 1.1.1.Final but
>> Wildfly 10.0.0.CR4
>> comes with 1.3.3.Final and there are some binary
>> incompatibilities in
>> io.undertow.server.Connectors of which
>> org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.SavedRequest is affected.
>> You are using io.undertow.util.ImmediatePooled instead of
>> the expected
>> type io.undertow.connector.PooledByteBuffer which leads
>> to method not
>> found exceptions.
>> I suggest you update the undertow version in the parent
>> pom.xml to make
>> sure everything is binary compatible if you are going to
>> support Wildfly
>> 10 as you announced.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160121/68648c26/attachment-0001.html
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list