[keycloak-dev] Keycloak on Wildfly 10

Christian Beikov christian.beikov at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 10:20:57 EST 2016


Because you probably didn't hit the code that is binary incompatible. As 
you can see in the stacktrace, the ungetRequestBytes method has a 
different signature in Undertow 1.3.x

Am 21.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Stian Thorgersen:
> It depends on what the actual problem is though, because we have 
> tested it on WF10 and we didn't discover any issues
>
> On 21 January 2016 at 16:18, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com 
> <mailto:sthorger at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     If the adapter is broken for WF10, we need to fix for 1.8 as well
>
>     On 21 January 2016 at 16:15, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com
>     <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>         Log a jira and schedule for 1.9.  I'll either create a new
>         adapter or find a workaround that is backward compatible.
>
>         On 1/21/2016 10:09 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>         What is your problem when you are actually using the adapter?
>>
>>         As I said we need the adapter to compile against multiple
>>         versions, we can not maintain one per version of WildFly.
>>
>>         On 21 January 2016 at 16:07, Christian Beikov
>>         <christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             As I wrote, when you change the Undertow version in the
>>             parent pom, a build will generate a compilation error
>>             when using the Undertow version that is used in Wildfly
>>             10 which would be 1.3.x.
>>
>>             I encountered the following exception in the Undertow
>>             adapters because of binary incompatibilities between
>>             Undertow 1.2.x and 1.3.x:
>>
>>             java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>             io.undertow.server.Connectors.ungetRequestBytes(Lio/undertow/server/HttpServerExchange;[Lorg/xnio/Pooled;)V
>>                     at
>>             org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.SavedRequest.tryRestoreRequest(SavedRequest.java:112)
>>                     at
>>             org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletSessionTokenStore.restoreRequest(ServletSessionTokenStore.java:119)
>>                     at
>>             org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletSessionTokenStore.isCached(ServletSessionTokenStore.java:67)
>>                     at
>>             org.keycloak.adapters.RequestAuthenticator.authenticate(RequestAuthenticator.java:88)
>>                     at
>>             org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.AbstractUndertowKeycloakAuthMech.keycloakAuthenticate(AbstractUndertowKeycloakAuthMech.java:110)
>>                     at
>>             org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletKeycloakAuthMech.authenticate(ServletKeycloakAuthMech.java:92)
>>
>>
>>             Regards,
>>             Christian
>>
>>
>>             Am 21.01.2016 um 16:00 schrieb Stian Thorgersen:
>>>             When we tested it, it worked. So I need more details
>>>             from you to reproduce this.
>>>
>>>             On 21 January 2016 at 14:50, Christian Beikov
>>>             <christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>>             <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 I deploy the adapter by overlaying/copying the
>>>                 adapter modules into my Wildfly.
>>>
>>>                 I understand that you support older Wildfly versions
>>>                 too, but I guess you have to create a separate
>>>                 adapter for Wildfly 10 then.
>>>                 You can easily see that there are incompatibilities
>>>                 between Undertow 1.2.x and 1.3.x which will result
>>>                 in a failed compilation if you change the Undertow
>>>                 version in the parent pom for testing purposes.
>>>
>>>                 Regards,
>>>                 Christian
>>>
>>>
>>>                 Am 21.01.2016 um 14:44 schrieb Stian Thorgersen:
>>>>                 BTW we support older versions of WildFly as well as
>>>>                 10, so it's not as simple as upgrading the undertow
>>>>                 version
>>>>
>>>>                 On 21 January 2016 at 14:43, Stian Thorgersen
>>>>                 <sthorger at redhat.com <mailto:sthorger at redhat.com>>
>>>>                 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     How are you deploying the adapter and what
>>>>                     adapter are you using? We have tested the
>>>>                     adapter with WildFly 10 (Keycloak 1.8.0.CR1 was
>>>>                     tested on 10.0.0.CR5) and it worked fine.
>>>>
>>>>                     On 21 January 2016 at 14:30, Christian Beikov
>>>>                     <christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>>>                     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                         Hello,
>>>>
>>>>                         I am trying to deploy Keycloak 1.8.0.CR1 to
>>>>                         Wildfly 10.0.0.CR4 but there
>>>>                         are some problems with that.
>>>>                         You are compiling against Undertow
>>>>                         1.1.1.Final but Wildfly 10.0.0.CR4
>>>>                         comes with 1.3.3.Final and there are some
>>>>                         binary incompatibilities in
>>>>                         io.undertow.server.Connectors of which
>>>>                         org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.SavedRequest
>>>>                         is affected.
>>>>                         You are using
>>>>                         io.undertow.util.ImmediatePooled instead of
>>>>                         the expected
>>>>                         type io.undertow.connector.PooledByteBuffer
>>>>                         which leads to method not
>>>>                         found exceptions.
>>>>                         I suggest you update the undertow version
>>>>                         in the parent pom.xml to make
>>>>                         sure everything is binary compatible if you
>>>>                         are going to support Wildfly
>>>>                         10 as you announced.
>>>>
>>>>                         Regards,
>>>>                         Christian
>>>>                         _______________________________________________
>>>>                         keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>                         keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>                         <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>                         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         keycloak-dev mailing list
>>         keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>         <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>         -- 
>         Bill Burke
>         JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>         http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         keycloak-dev mailing list
>         keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160121/057173ca/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list