[keycloak-dev] Feedback

Bill Burke bburke at redhat.com
Fri Jun 10 09:39:07 EDT 2016



On 6/9/16 11:04 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Got the authz stuff working with the adapters. It was a puzzle but I think I have something.
Yeah, its nasty.  Every servlet container handlers security just a bit 
differently than others so, its ugly.

> * I've discarded my own sub-types of AccessToken, they were redundant. The only difference between authz tokens and access tokens was a list of permissions. And the concept behind them is the same. I've added a "authorization" claim to AccessToken (null by default) from where permissions granted by the server can be obtained.
Is a claim better?  Or should AccessTokenResponse optionally contain the 
RPT?  Or optionally a query param for Implicit Flow?  Or have both?  I 
don't know.




More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list