[keycloak-dev] feature request

Stian Thorgersen sthorger at redhat.com
Wed Oct 12 07:45:44 EDT 2016


I'm not sure what you are asking.

On 12 October 2016 at 08:28, Mátyás Bachorecz <bachoreczm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually I got your solution, but don't really understand what is the
> purpose of this feature? Why should I use DNS? I know that HTTPS is so
> important, but I can configure my realm to require HTTPS, so in the above
> mentioned situation I wouldn't like to use DNS names.
> So my main question is: what is the purpose of this feature?
>
> Br,
> Matyi
>
> On 12 October 2016 at 07:48, Mátyás Bachorecz <bachoreczm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I understand, thank you for your answer.
>>
>> On 12 October 2016 at 07:00, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You can obviously use DNS settings and the machines hosts file to change
>>> what IP address the name resolves to.
>>>
>>> https://machine.local could resolve to 10.0.0.12 or 192.168.1.12
>>> depending on where it's called from.
>>>
>>> On 12 October 2016 at 06:59, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [Adding list again]
>>>>
>>>> Token based security relies on HTTPS for security. You need to use the
>>>> HTTPs domain name when you are contacting Keycloak. The HTTPs domain should
>>>> match the issuer of the domain.
>>>>
>>>> On 11 October 2016 at 18:56, Mátyás Bachorecz <bachoreczm at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My token audience does not match, because we request for a token via
>>>>> floating ip (openstack, like 10.xx.xx.xx), and would like to validate via
>>>>> private ip (like 192.168.xx.xx). So my question is how to solve this
>>>>> problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> There are two machines, one belongs to user, and on the other we
>>>>> running keycloak, and a client, which can validate token. But client only
>>>>> nows the private ip, and user can't access keycloak on private ip, cause
>>>>> he/she is not in that network.
>>>>>
>>>>> Br,
>>>>> Matyi
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 October 2016 at 18:45, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rather than hacking Keycloak you should figure out why your token
>>>>>> audience doesn't match. For a token to be valid it has to been issued by
>>>>>> the same server URL and realm. It's an important check and we wouldn't
>>>>>> accept a feature that prevents it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11 October 2016 at 17:07, Mátyás Bachorecz <bachoreczm at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we have a multi-component project, and all components running in one
>>>>>>> machine, also Keycloak.
>>>>>>> We would like to obtain token via curl, and our components would
>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>> validate it, but they can't, because we've got:
>>>>>>> "Token audience doesn't match domain. Token issuer is " +
>>>>>>> token.getIssuer()
>>>>>>> + ", but URL from configuration is " + realmUrl
>>>>>>> (RSATokenVerifier.java)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to implement a new feature: a new checkbox or something
>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>> to realm settings page, which can switch off the above mentioned
>>>>>>> feature.
>>>>>>> I've read that I should write an email here if I would like to
>>>>>>> implement
>>>>>>> something. Is it ok, or how it works?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Br,
>>>>>>> Matyi
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list