[keycloak-dev] Branches for the quickstarts

[Bruno Oliveira]

I truly feel that we are talking about completely different things.

But you can add your considerations to this Jira:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3577

On Thu, May 18, 2017, 4:58 PM Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com> wrote:

> What we really need for the quickstarts is something Bill has been
> talking about for a long time.
>
> It's a bundle of Keycloak and examples that just boots up and works.
> Otherwise, the quickstarts are way too hard to get running.  Nobody
> wants to spend 2 or 3 hours on a "quickstart". That's what I had to do
> recently and I already know what's going on.  I hate to think about what
> someone new to Keycloak needs to go through just to see an example.
>
> This doesn't have to mean that everything runs in the same WildFly
> instance like the old demo dist.  The problem with that was that it
> didn't show Keycloak set up as a stand-alone server.
>
> What you need is a single bundle that lets you run Keycloak standalone
> and a standalone app server.  I see a couple of ways to do it:
> 1) Use domain mode where you get a domain controller, Keycloak instance,
> and app server instance all in the same JVM.
> 2) Use two separate server configs and run in two JVM's.
>
> I think #2 is the best.  The Keycloak instance runs on port 8180 and the
> app server runs on 8080.  You only need one download of
> WildFly/Keycloak, but you package it with two configs.  So you have:
> /bin
> /modules
> /domain (don't actually need this one)
> /standalone
> /keycloak
>
> To run Keycloak (preloaded with quickstart realm):
>  > standalone --server-config=keycloak
> -Djboss.socket.binding.port-offset=100
>
> To run app server (preloaded with quickstart apps):
>  > standalone
>
>
>
> On 5/18/2017 1:59 PM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> > Hmmm I'm not sure about that. That would be the completely opposite of
> what
> > we already do to any repository today. If people want the stable release
> of
> > the quickstarts they could just get 3.x or download the zip files, nope?
> >
> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:15 PM Sebastien Blanc <sblanc at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> We should also consider the opposite : master is the stable released
> >> version and a branch for development . I already had confused people
> >> downloading KC server and cloning the QuickStarts and expecting it to
> work.
> >> But tbh I do not have a string opinion on that.
> >> Le jeu. 18 mai 2017 à 18:57, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> a
> >> écrit :
> >>
> >>> While working today on the fix of some quickstarts. I'm
> >>> considering to create a separated branch only for stable versions of
> the
> >>> quickstarts.
> >>>
> >>> In this way 'master' would be used only for development based on the
> >>> latest bits from Keycloak repo. And 3.1.x, to the latest stable
> >>> release on Maven central.
> >>>
> >>> Does it make any sense?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> abstractj
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> keycloak-dev mailing list
> >>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >>>
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev