[keycloak-dev] Doc renaming and organization suggestion

[Stian Thorgersen]

-1 I see a clear distinction between someone that wants to secure
applications/services with Keycloak and someone that wants to extend the
Keycloak server. Even when it's the same person they are very different
tasks.

On 2 October 2017 at 16:37, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:

> I suggest we rename Server Developer Guide to Keycloak (RH-SSO)
> Developer Guide.  We move all programmer related SPIs, REST interface
> docs (token exchange), Client Registration, adapter SPIs, really
> anything a developer would do to this guide.
>
> Securing Apps should be specifically configuration tasks for securing
> an application.  Only things an admin would do and no developer
> concerns should be there.
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>