[keycloak-dev] infinispan as a storage mechanism

[Bill Burke]

Other than MongoDB not supporting transactions or even sessions?  And
requiring a DB to be run in a separate VM?

No not really :)



On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva at redhat.com> wrote:
> Isn't this somewhat related with what we used to have with MongoDB ?
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> If we had a built-in, clusterable storage mechanism for Keycloak using
>> Infinispan we would:
>> * Shorten build times drastically.  30 minutes and growing for me for
>> JPA builds.  Liquibase + JPA startup takes 5-7 seconds on my box.
>> * Simpler startup.  No need to start a DB.
>> * Reduce memory footprint?  I think JPA is responsible for a lot of
>> classes loaded.
>>
>> I've started some work on this in spare time.  I'd say I'd be done in
>> like 2 months considering the other work I have in queue.
>>
>> Looking at FineGrainAtomicMap as an implementation.  Should make DB
>> migration simple and replication quicker.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> Red Hat
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>



-- 
Bill Burke
Red Hat