[keycloak-dev] development image?

[Bruno Oliveira]

Maybe we can just provide an option for people to mount
$HOME/.m2/repository ?

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:52 PM Marko Strukelj <mstrukel at redhat.com> wrote:

> The problematic part is 'mvn clean install' which will pull down the
> internet of dependencies as if you're building for the first time - every
> time.
>
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2018 00:56, "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill, I think it makes sense. But there are few things that people can't
> avoid, like install JDK for development.
>
> On AeroGear we had a -dev image like you described[1]
>
> [1] -
>
> https://github.com/jboss-dockerfiles/aerogear/blob/master/wildfly/unifiedpush-wildfly-dev/Dockerfile
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:21 PM Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Do we need a development image that builds from master.  A Dockerfile
> > script that:
> >
> > - derives from jdk8
> > - installs git client
> > - install maven
> > - git clone https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak
> > - mvn clean install -Pdistro -DskipTests=true
> > - unzip distro into /opt/keycloak
> >
> > We have a couple of teams asking for something like this within Red
> > Hat as I'm guessing they don't want to deal with running maven
> > themselves.  Does that sort of flow make sense?
> >
> > --
> > Bill Burke
> > Red Hat
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>