[keycloak-dev] development image?

[Stian Thorgersen]

Is the use-case folks that want to try out a feature available in master,
but not in a Keycloak release yet?

What about having daily builds instead? We could have both ZIPs and Docker
images built daily.

On 17 January 2018 at 20:18, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Oh, I forgot about a better option. Upload snapshots from Travis to Maven
> repository and build the docker image based on the latest build. In this
> way we don't need to build everything from scratch, because Travis already
> does it.
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:01 PM Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I believe something like this is what you meant
> > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/abstractj/dockerfiles/
> keycloak/keycloak/keycloak-latest/Dockerfile.
> > Some considerations about this:
> >
> > 1. We can automate the build on Docker Hub, but it's gonna take like
> > forever at each build. Because it's going to download the internet like
> > Marko mentioned
> > 2. Maybe we should consider a smarter way of caching .m2 repositories. I
> > just can think about a manual process for this.
> > 3. In order to keep the image fresh, might be necessary to trigger the
> > image build from Travis remotely. I'm not sure if we want this.
> >
> > Another alternative which I think may solve these 3 items above, is to
> > provide weekly builds of this docker image.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:29 PM Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> .This image is for people that don't want to know anything about maven
> >> our our build system and want to use a distro built from master.
> >>
> >> For developers like us, we just write a 2 line Dockerfile and mount
> >> local disk to the image.  This way you never have to rebuild the image
> >> as you're developing as everything is in local disk.  This is how I
> >> approached things lately when I was fidling around the master +
> >> kubernetes.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Marko Strukelj <mstrukel at redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Yeah, we could also checkout code in 'development' subdirectory and
> >> provide
> >> > an option to mount local dir as 'development'. We could also provide
> >> option
> >> > to skip checkout and to use existing code in the mounted
> >> > ~/development/keycloak - that would use your local working version of
> >> > keycloak - so you can have it open in your IDE and do a rebuild
> >> iteration
> >> > quickly ...
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe we can just provide an option for people to mount
> >> >> $HOME/.m2/repository ?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:52 PM Marko Strukelj <mstrukel at redhat.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The problematic part is 'mvn clean install' which will pull down the
> >> >>> internet of dependencies as if you're building for the first time -
> >> every
> >> >>> time.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Jan 16, 2018 00:56, "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi Bill, I think it makes sense. But there are few things that
> people
> >> >>> can't
> >> >>> avoid, like install JDK for development.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On AeroGear we had a -dev image like you described[1]
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1] -
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> https://github.com/jboss-dockerfiles/aerogear/blob/
> master/wildfly/unifiedpush-wildfly-dev/Dockerfile
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:21 PM Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Do we need a development image that builds from master.  A
> >> Dockerfile
> >> >>> > script that:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > - derives from jdk8
> >> >>> > - installs git client
> >> >>> > - install maven
> >> >>> > - git clone https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak
> >> >>> > - mvn clean install -Pdistro -DskipTests=true
> >> >>> > - unzip distro into /opt/keycloak
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > We have a couple of teams asking for something like this within
> Red
> >> >>> > Hat as I'm guessing they don't want to deal with running maven
> >> >>> > themselves.  Does that sort of flow make sense?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Bill Burke
> >> >>> > Red Hat
> >> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >> >>> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> >> >>> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> keycloak-dev mailing list
> >> >>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bill Burke
> >> Red Hat
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>