[keycloak-dev] Credentials in javascript adapter

Marek Posolda mposolda at redhat.com
Sun Nov 17 15:09:59 EST 2019


On 15. 11. 19 21:10, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 11/15/2019 12:15 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>> On 11/15/2019 9:05 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>> The account console should be a confidential client as it is there for
>>> the old account console.
>>>
>>> Instead you should create a new client for the new account console.
>> Sigh.  That's definitely not the answer I was hoping for.
> So this is looking like a very big change.  There is code all over the
> place assuming that the client id is "account".  I really don't want to
> hack up our code everywhere to make it point to a different client
> definition every time the Theme is set to "keycloak-preview".  It's more
> than just changing the return value of
> Constants.ACCOUNT_MANAGEMENT_CLIENT_ID.
>
> Additionally, any changes I make would need to revert back once new
> account console becomes standard.  So changes that only support tech
> preview don't make a lot of sense.
>
> I see two less-invasive solutions:
> 1) Allow the old account console to be a public client.
> 2) Document that "tech preview" users should go to Client -> account.
> Then change the Access Type to "public".

The old account console is using a bit different flow than normal OIDC 
confidential clients. It relies on the fact that it is deployed on same 
server as Keycloak and it just uses the Keycloak cookies like 
KEYCLOAK_IDENTITY cookie for the authentication. AFAIK it doesn't use 
any OIDC backchannel requests, which require client authentication.

In other words, I think that changing old account console to public 
client shouldn't break anything. So IMO solution 1 will just work.

However I am not 100% sure. It will be good to run the testsuite after 
changing the "account" client to public and do some more checks of 
sources. But AFAIK I can't recall any reason why it won't work.

Marek


>
>>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 14:03, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com
>>> <mailto:ssilvert at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>       On 11/7/2019 7:46 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>>       > It might be there from the early days when we didn't have public
>>>       clients.
>>>       > I'd probably just keep it in case someone is using it with a
>>>       confidential
>>>       > client as removing it would break it for them. Although strictly
>>>       speaking
>>>       > you shouldn't use a confidential client with a client-side app.
>>>       There is something else left over from when we didn't have public
>>>       clients.  The account console is still a confidential client.
>>>
>>>       With this latest change in the javascript adapter, the new account
>>>       console is broken.  (Both old and new account console use the same
>>>       client definition)
>>>
>>>       Does anyone have an issue with changing the (old and new) account
>>>       console to a public client?
>>>
>>>       >
>>>       > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 07:42, Michal Hajas <mhajas at redhat.com
>>>       <mailto:mhajas at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>       >
>>>       >> Hello,
>>>       >>
>>>       >> in Javascript adapter we have a possibility to configure a
>>>       client secret
>>>       >> [1] in order to use Basic authorization for requests for token
>>>       endpoint
>>>       >> [2]. I haven't found any information in docs about it and I don't
>>>       >> understand why we have it there as public clients don't have
>>>       secrets. Is
>>>       >> this useful in some scenarios or we should remove it?
>>>       >>
>>>       >> Michal
>>>       >>
>>>       >> [1]
>>>       >>
>>>       >>
>>>       https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/adapters/oidc/js/src/main/resources/keycloak.js#L882
>>>       >> &
>>>       >>
>>>       <https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/adapters/oidc/js/src/main/resources/keycloak.js#L882&>
>>>       >>
>>>       >>
>>>       https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/adapters/oidc/js/src/main/resources/keycloak.js#L866
>>>       >>
>>>       >> [2]
>>>       >>
>>>       >>
>>>       https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/adapters/oidc/js/src/main/resources/keycloak.js#L617
>>>       >> &
>>>       >>
>>>       <https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/adapters/oidc/js/src/main/resources/keycloak.js#L617&>
>>>       >>
>>>       >>
>>>       https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/adapters/oidc/js/src/main/resources/keycloak.js#L732
>>>       >> _______________________________________________
>>>       >> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>       >> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>       >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>       >>
>>>       > _______________________________________________
>>>       > keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>       > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>       > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev





More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list