[keycloak-user] Docker images

[Juraci Paixão Kröhling]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Ok, so, what about this then:

- - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war + KC subsystem)
- - keycloak-wildfly (wildfly + KC subsystem, no auth-server)
- - keycloak-examples ("keycloak-full" image + examples)

What about the names? Do they match the expectation?

- - Juca.

On 06/12/2014 02:52 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 6/12/2014 8:49 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>> 
>> On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>>> - - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
>> I would say no to this one.  Eventually, the whole wildfly
>> instance will be secured by KC and we will need the subsystem.
>> 
>> 
> I'll add my -1 as well.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTmadJAAoJEDnJtskdmzLMT80H/0951MgR5r18RWnzCLsN2nfn
ZTZcgPrz/OKiaYvqINYPXza0kskhexW7bxV+AeJigIpTdlliuFz6d9cchTyxyDT9
1KyVCeQyFPBgr3n1JyK6k0Z3Oud/8W2MvRjkW+rDoB2H9O/Y/aow6d4ADkVuDp27
0bG0WIrIWnFD8Agv+CcrY9+kbkXGXXyJRBQqv6qLJL/+7OU3MLy7evhgb2nbtJrY
MiynWxcwVc8GWaaB+h8chwE/ZAtvjfvF/5X4MwBcR1bqzW/hF20bUdLgCSDG3QId
zzaUCI/pcpfbMGvwPN9Yyd6KYUic8tfpWSqEx+jluVd7uRI0RVg4ew93srLE0dI=
=In75
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----