[keycloak-user] LiveOak integration with Keycloak

Marek Posolda mposolda at redhat.com
Mon Sep 8 13:50:01 EDT 2014


It's in official LiveOak documentation now 
http://liveoak.io/docs/guides/tutorial_keycloak_separate/ .

Marek

On 6.9.2014 18:43, Dean Peterson wrote:
> Perfect, thank you!
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Marek Posolda <mposolda at redhat.com 
> <mailto:mposolda at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     I've added some "quick and dirty" instructions on how to use
>     separate Keycloak from your Liveoak
>     https://github.com/mposolda/mposolda.github.io/blob/master/tmp/Separate-Keycloak.md
>     . I will try to properly document somewhere later, until then you
>     can use those temporary instructions. You will also need latest
>     LiveOak master.
>
>     Let me know if it suits your needs or if seeing some issues...
>
>     Marek
>
>
>     On 2.9.2014 09:37, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
>         To make LiveOak as easy as possible to use we wanted it to
>         work out of the box, so we include a ready bootstrapped Keycloak.
>
>         It's quite easy to remove the bootstrap Keycloak server and
>         use your own. Marek is going to upgrade Keycloak in LiveOak
>         soon and he'll add some documentation on how to use an
>         external Keycloak server.
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>
>             From: "Dean Peterson" <peterson.dean at gmail.com
>             <mailto:peterson.dean at gmail.com>>
>             To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>             <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
>             Sent: Tuesday, 2 September, 2014 3:50:54 AM
>             Subject: [keycloak-user] LiveOak integration with Keycloak
>
>             I am wondering about the KeycloakApplication class the
>             LiveOak project seems
>             to be using to extend Keycloak for their framework. I
>             really like what
>             LiveOak is doing but I am not able to understand why they
>             would couple
>             everything to a custom version of Keycloak. I want to have
>             a separate
>             Keycloak server that handles security for whatever
>             applications I have. It
>             seems their decision to include Keycloak in the deployment
>             of LiveOak
>             prevents me from deploying multiple LiveOak domain models
>             on separate
>             servers. Every LiveOak will have its own instance of
>             Keycloak. I am asking
>             here because it seems Stian has had a hand in the creation
>             of LiveOak and I
>             was hoping he might see this and shed some light on the
>             subject. There is
>             little documentation on the KeycloakApplication class. Is
>             that used to
>             easily extend Keycloak and embed it into other frameworks?
>             Doesn't that
>             defeat the purpose of Security As A Service? Any ideas how
>             I might decouple
>             Keycloak from LiveOak?
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             keycloak-user mailing list
>             keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>             <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
>             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         keycloak-user mailing list
>         keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>         <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20140908/5d872fa3/attachment.html 


More information about the keycloak-user mailing list