[keycloak-user] Infinispan caching issues because of unserializable classes

Stian Thorgersen sthorger at redhat.com
Wed Dec 2 03:32:18 EST 2015


Been digging into this some more and turns out there's a pretty nasty bug
[1] in the way we our caches are implemented. It's a simple fix though and
will be resolved for 1.7.

[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2179

On 1 December 2015 at 10:40, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com> wrote:

> We can make those classes serializable. Create a JIRA for it. It's to late
> for 1.7 release though so won't be fixed until 1.8.
>
> We also don't do any testing with ASYNC (as we know it will be
> problematic, especially since Keycloak doesn't require sticky sessions) or
> replicated caches, as we recommend using sync + invalidation caches.
>
> On 30 November 2015 at 17:56, Lohitha Chiranjeewa <kalc04 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree that there could be inconsistent behavior with ASYNC mode
>> depending on what your use case is.
>>
>> However, shouldn't the classes I mentioned be made serializable in any
>> case? They are directly referenced from the classes inside infinispan cache
>> model package.
>> On Nov 30, 2015 7:56 PM, "Stian Thorgersen" <sthorger at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't not recommend setting async as you may get unpredictable
>>> behavior
>>>
>>> On 30 November 2015 at 15:07, Lohitha Chiranjeewa <kalc04 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, the 'mode' of 'realms' and 'users' caches were changed to 'ASYNC'.
>>>> This causes the app to store the invalidations temporarily w/o sending to
>>>> other nodes and flush them all only when a threshold value is arrived. I
>>>> think this storage method causes the Serialization issue.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Did you change caching configuration?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/30/2015 8:50 AM, Lohitha Chiranjeewa wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Issue came up with Realm and User caches. Not User Sessions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com
>>>>>> <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Or is this related to UserSession cache?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On 11/30/2015 8:45 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>>>>      > We don't replicate at all.  Why would this be an issue?
>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>      > On 11/30/2015 8:41 AM, Lohitha Chiranjeewa wrote:
>>>>>>      >> When Infinispan caching is enabled in ASYNC mode, exceptions
>>>>>> get
>>>>>>     logged
>>>>>>      >> at startup due to serialization issues. Basically the
>>>>>> following
>>>>>>     classes
>>>>>>      >> have to implement the Serialiazable interface:
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >> org.keycloak.models.OTPPolicy
>>>>>>      >> org.keycloak.models.
>>>>>>      >> RequiredActionProviderModel
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >> There could be other classes as well.
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >> Is this already fixed in 1.7.0 code or shall I put a JIRA?
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >> Regards,
>>>>>>      >> Lohitha.
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>      >> keycloak-user mailing list
>>>>>>      >> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>>>> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>      >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     --
>>>>>>     Bill Burke
>>>>>>     JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>>>>     http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>     keycloak-user mailing list
>>>>>>     keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>>>> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bill Burke
>>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> keycloak-user mailing list
>>>> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20151202/ea97950a/attachment.html 


More information about the keycloak-user mailing list