[keycloak-user] Replace use of Infinispan with User Sessions SPI ?

[Scott Rossillo]

I highly suggest, from production experience, that you stick with
Infinispan.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:56 PM Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:

> Yes, you can replace Infinispan... No, we will not support you :)  We
> had to reduce the scope of Keycloak.  Same reason why we only support
> running the server on Wildfly/EAP now.  Its just too much extra work.
>
> On 12/11/2015 8:14 AM, Niko Köbler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in my current project, it’s not wanted to use Infinispan as cache in a
> cluster.
> > However, I have to deal with the user session and token information.
> > And as I can remember, in early versions of Keycloak was an option, to
> store this information via JPA or MongoDB instead of Infinispan.
> > Also, I saw there is a User Sessions SPI, and also a User Cache SPI and
> Realm Cache SPI.
> > If I implement those SPIs, can I get rid of Infinispan replication in a
> cluster?
> > And are there some examples or good starting points? (documentation?)
> >
> > Regards,
> > - Niko
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20151212/ac640e9c/attachment.html