[keycloak-user] Keycloak to set up Teams and Organizations (Bill Burke)

[Bill Burke]

Yeah, that's pretty much how we're gonna do it.

On 10/13/2015 1:37 PM, Schneider, John           DODGE CONSULTING 
SERVICES, LLC wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> For the most part, I liked how PicketLink IDM relationships were structured.  If I recall correctly, it was something like this:
> Users could be assigned to 0...n Groups
> Groups could have subgroups
> Roles could be assigned to 0...n Groups
> Roles could be assigned to 0..n Users
>
> So, we could manage security within a hierarchical group structure but also add additional roles on per-user basis when needed.  If it could all also optionally be done with composite roles, all the better.
>
> Some relevant documentation:
> https://docs.jboss.org/picketlink/2/latest/reference/html-single/#chap-Identity_Management_-_Basic_Identity_Model
> https://docs.jboss.org/picketlink/2/latest/reference/html-single/#sect-Managing_Relationships
> https://docs.jboss.org/picketlink/2/latest/reference/html-single/#Realms_and_Tiers
>
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Keycloak to set up Teams and
> 	Organizations
> To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <561D2EBC.50509 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> You just want something like github groups?  List your requirements.
>
> I am starting on Groups next week after 1.6 goes out.
>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com