[keycloak-user] token_type "bearer" vs "Bearer"

[Iván Perdomo]

Hi Marek,

On 09/16/2015 07:08 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
> Funny, OIDC specs itself also has one place when it uses "bearer" . See
> the example:
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#ImplicitAuthResponse .

You're right. The example uses "bearer" but also does not follow the RFC
6750, right?

> 
> Feel free to create JIRA and we can change to "Bearer" . Still, it looks
> to me more like a bug in django-oidc, which should ignore cases.

Issue created:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-1855

> 
> Marek

Thanks for your support,

-- 
Iván

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20150917/656b0b15/attachment.bin