[keycloak-user] Authorization code flow without a browser
Aikeaguinea
aikeaguinea at xsmail.com
Wed Apr 27 11:17:30 EDT 2016
As I understand it, using the authorization code flow rather than the
implicit flow is recommended where possible.
We have a server-side client application, but the user agents making
requests are not browsers, but instead our own code.
I'm not entirely sure how to make the authorization code flow work
without a browser. For instance, if on the command line I request
curl
'http://host:port/auth/realms/foo/protocol/openid-connect/auth?response_type=code&client_id=test-client&state=state&redirect_uri=http://www.example.com/hello-world'
Then (assuming the parameters are correct) I get back an HTML login page
with a form. In order to submit the credentials, I would need to dig the
URL out of the action of the form and then submit a request like
curl -X POST -d 'username=test-user' -d 'password=test1234'
'http://host:port/auth/realms/foo/login-actions/authenticate?code=Ctr79aRsbwPPkC4nEeT2vR9-TuC31uuXngQXoHQH6FE.ef26cfcd-a35b-4d1e-a4f7-49790f6e2f00&execution=a86f56da-9900-4f1d-a461-f18617a2333b'
Three questions:
1. Is there some reason I shouldn't be trying to implement the
authorization code flow like this?
2. Is there a way to get the proper login action back without having to
dig it out of an HTML form? I've tried adding --header "Accept:
application/json" to the command but this has no effect.
3. Is there a way of submitting credentials other than by using form
parameters? I've tried HTTP basic auth but it doesn't work for me.
--
Aikeaguinea
aikeaguinea at xsmail.com
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Same, same, but different...
More information about the keycloak-user
mailing list