[keycloak-user] Create A New Group (name is not unique)

[Bill Burke]

Yeah, i was lazy about that and forgot to put a check in later on.

On 1/11/2016 2:40 AM, Juraj Janosik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it a correct and expected behaviour in the group concept,
> that the name of the group is not unique,
> that means, that it is possible to create a new group with the same name?
>
> The same behaviour occurs in Admin console and via REST API too.
>
> [
>     {
>         "id": "150a8547-fd3f-4245-ab91-328d8afb83c2",
>         "name": "group_tests",
>         "path": "/group_tests",
>         "subGroups":
>         [
>         ]
>     },
>     {
>         "id": "bc7969e6-e7c9-4617-b03e-18665293636a",
>         "name": "group_tests",
>         "path": "/group_tests",
>         "subGroups":
>         [
>         ]
>     },
>     {
>         "id": "5447d305-a47e-4ad9-a29b-f478396accf6",
>         "name": "group_tests",
>         "path": "/group_tests",
>         "subGroups":
>         [
>         ]
>     }
> ]
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Juraj
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20160111/c81365c2/attachment.html